When is a solvent that barely evaporates actually wanted?
When solvent loss would change the product. In an ink that must not skin in the reservoir, in a fluid that must not lose volume over its service life, or in a system where evaporation would raise viscosity over time, a non-volatile solvent is the requirement rather than a compromise. TE is specified in exactly those situations.
2
How does TE differ from TM?
One carbon on the end cap. The ethyl group gives slightly better compatibility with organic resins than the methyl equivalent while retaining full water miscibility, and it raises the boiling point marginally. Both sit firmly in the non-volatile, strongly hydrophilic corner of the glycol ether range.
3
Is TE used as a plasticiser?
Yes, and the reasoning is the same as for other high-boiling glycol ethers: a plasticiser must stay in the polymer rather than migrating out and evaporating, and very low volatility is the property that delivers that. Its free hydroxyl also allows it to be used as an intermediate for larger plasticiser molecules.
4
What should be considered when specifying TE?
That it remains in the finished product. Because it does not evaporate, its compatibility with the finished formulation matters as much as its compatibility with the process, and any effect on hardness, water sensitivity or long-term stability should be assessed on aged samples rather than on freshly made material.
Still have questions?
Our team is ready to help with any specific enquiries about TE - Triethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether.